![]() Consider this Miura’s best-of-both-worlds design. But with a Tour-inspired profile (the shape is slightly larger than the MC-501), it’s able to remain firmly entrenched in the player category at the same time. Our take: Miura’s CB-301 is packed with the kind of forgiveness and speed you’d expect to find in a game-improvement iron. MORE INFO ON THE PING BLUEPRINT IRONS| BUY NOW Robot’s take: A ball speed and carry leader in the category, producing higher flight and negating unwanted spin. ![]() ![]() Don’t usually see those two things together.” The Blueprint is the definition of a modern-day blade.ĬlubTester’s take (2-hdcp): “Small profile, but I watched the ball rocket off the face. Even for a scratch golfer, getting a few more yards is a welcome sight when you’re going toe to toe with players who are using better-player products. The beauty of these irons is how effortlessly they blend the DNA of a muscleback with the power of a better-player iron. And did we mention the intricate four-step, multistage process? The Blueprint may be a one-piece forging, but more than 50 steps are required during manufacturing, including machining the face and grooves. A machined tungsten screw in the toe gives the head a slight bump in heel-toe forgiveness over the traditional version. Forged from 8620 carbon steel, the iron boasts reduced offset and a shorter blade length than PING’s iBlade. Only this isn’t the version your dad grew up with. Which brings us to PING’s Blueprint, a blade that certainly looks the part. You’re giving up all of the comforts that come with a larger profile for something that works the ball on command and hits a certain yardage with regularity. Our take: Muscleback blades are supposed to be butter-knife thin and lack the forgiveness and distance typically found in a better-player cavity-back.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |